The standard way in which Mathematica
works is to take any expression you give as input, evaluate the expression completely, and then return the result. When you are trying to understand what Mathematica
is doing, however, it is often worthwhile to look not just at the final result of evaluation, but also at intermediate steps in the evaluation process.
|Trace[expr]||generate a list of all expressions used in the evaluation of expr|
|Trace[expr,form]||include only expressions which match the pattern form|
Tracing the evaluation of expressions.
The expression 1+1
is evaluated immediately to 2
is evaluated before the addition is done.
The evaluation of each subexpression is shown in a separate sublist.
gives a list which includes all
the intermediate expressions involved in the evaluation of expr
. Except in rather simple cases, however, the number of intermediate expressions generated in this way is typically very large, and the list returned by Trace
is difficult to understand.
allows you to "filter" the expressions that Trace
records, keeping only those which match the pattern form
Here is a recursive definition of a factorial function.
This gives all
the intermediate expressions generated in the evaluation of fac
. The result is quite complicated.
This shows only intermediate expressions of the form fac[n_]
You can specify any pattern in Trace
|Out= |Trace[expr, form]
effectively works by intercepting every expression that is about to be evaluated during the evaluation of expr
, and picking out those that match the pattern form
If you want to trace "calls" to a function like fac
, you can do so simply by telling Trace
to pick out expressions of the form fac[n_]
. You can also use patterns like f[n_, 2]
to pick out calls with particular argument structure.
A typical Mathematica
program, however, consists not only of "function calls" like fac[n]
, but also of other elements, such as assignments to variables, control structures, and so on. All of these elements are represented as expressions. As a result, you can use patterns in Trace
to pick out any kind of Mathematica
program element. Thus, for example, you can use a pattern like k=_
to pick out all assignments to the symbol k
This shows the sequence of assignments made for k
|Out= |Trace[expr, form]
can pick out expressions that occur at any time in the evaluation of expr
. The expressions need not, for example, appear directly in the form of expr
that you give. They may instead occur, say, during the evaluation of functions that are called as part of the evaluation of expr
Here is a function definition.
You can look for expressions generated during the evaluation of h
allows you to monitor intermediate steps in the evaluation not only of functions that you define, but also of some functions that are built into Mathematica
. You should realize, however, that the specific sequence of intermediate steps followed by built-in Mathematica
functions depends in detail on their implementation and optimization in a particular version of Mathematica
|Trace[expr,f[___]]||show all calls to the function f|
|Trace[expr,i=_]||show assignments to i|
|Trace[expr,_=_]||show all assignments|
|Trace[expr,Message[___]]||show messages generated|
Some ways to use Trace.
The function Trace
returns a list that represents the "history" of a Mathematica
computation. The expressions in the list are given in the order that they were generated during the computation. In most cases, the list returned by Trace
has a nested structure, which represents the "structure" of the computation.
The basic idea is that each sublist in the list returned by Trace
represents the "evaluation chain" for a particular Mathematica
expression. The elements of this chain correspond to different forms of the same expression. Usually, however, the evaluation of one expression requires the evaluation of a number of other expressions, often subexpressions. Each subsidiary evaluation is represented by a sublist in the structure returned by Trace
Here is a sequence of assignments.
This yields an evaluation chain reflecting the sequence of transformations for a[i]
The successive forms generated in the simplification of y+x+y
show up as successive elements in its evaluation chain.
Each argument of the function f
has a separate evaluation chain, given in a sublist.
The evaluation chain for each subexpression is given in a separate sublist.
Tracing the evaluation of a nested expression yields a nested list.
There are two basic ways that subsidiary evaluations can be required during the evaluation of a Mathematica
expression. The first way is that the expression may contain subexpressions, each of which has to be evaluated. The second way is that there may be rules for the evaluation of the expression that involve other expressions which themselves must be evaluated. Both kinds of subsidiary evaluations are represented by sublists in the structure returned by Trace
The subsidiary evaluations here come from evaluation of the arguments of f
Here is a function with a condition attached.
The evaluation of fe
involves a subsidiary evaluation associated with the condition.
You often get nested lists when you trace the evaluation of functions that are defined "recursively" in terms of other instances of themselves. The reason is typically that each new instance of the function appears as a subexpression in the expressions obtained by evaluating previous instances of the function.
Thus, for example, with the definition fac[n_]:=n fac[n-1]
, the evaluation of fac
yields the expression 6 fac
, which contains fac
as a subexpression.
The successive instances of fac
generated appear in successively nested sublists.
With this definition, fp[n-1]
is obtained directly as the value of fp[n]
never appears in a subexpression, so no sublists are generated.
Here is the recursive definition of the Fibonacci numbers.
Here are the end conditions for the recursion.
This shows all the steps in the recursive evaluation of fib
Each step in the evaluation of any Mathematica
expression can be thought of as the result of applying a particular transformation rule. As discussed in "Associating Definitions with Different Symbols"
, all the rules that Mathematica
knows are associated with specific symbols or "tags". You can use Trace[expr, f]
to see all the steps in the evaluation of expr
that are performed using transformation rules associated with the symbol f
. In this case, Trace
gives not only the expressions to which each rule is applied, but also the results of applying the rules.
In general, Trace[expr, form]
picks out all the steps in the evaluation of expr
the expression about to be evaluated, or
the tag associated with the rule used.
|Trace[expr,f]||show all evaluations which use transformation rules associated with the symbol f|
|Trace[expr,f|g]||show all evaluations associated with either f or g|
Tracing evaluations associated with particular tags.
This shows only intermediate expressions that match fac[_]
This shows all evaluations that use transformation rules associated with the symbol fac
Here is a rule for the log
This traces the evaluation of log[abcd]
, showing all transformations associated with log
|switch on tracing only within forms matching oform|
|switch off tracing within any form matching oform|
Switching off tracing inside certain forms.
allows you to trace expressions matching form
generated at any point in the evaluation of expr
. Sometimes, you may want to trace only expressions generated during certain parts of the evaluation of expr
By setting the option TraceOn->oform
, you can specify that tracing should be done only during the evaluation of forms which match oform
. Similarly, by setting TraceOff->oform
, you can specify that tracing should be switched off during the evaluation of forms which match oform
This shows all steps in the evaluation.
This shows only those steps that occur during the evaluation of fac
This shows only those steps that do not occur during the evaluation of fac
|Trace[expr,lhs->rhs]||find all expressions matching lhs that arise during the evaluation of expr, and replace them with rhs|
Applying rules to expressions encountered during evaluation.
This tells Trace
to return only the arguments of fib
used in the evaluation of fib
A powerful aspect of the Mathematica Trace
function is that the object it returns is basically a standard Mathematica
expression which you can manipulate using other Mathematica
functions. One important point to realize, however, is that Trace
wraps all expressions that appear in the list it produces with HoldForm
to prevent them from being evaluated. The HoldForm
is not displayed in standard Mathematica
output format, but it is still present in the internal structure of the expression.
This shows the expressions generated at intermediate stages in the evaluation process.
The expressions are wrapped with HoldForm
to prevent them from evaluating.
In standard Mathematica
output format, it is sometimes difficult to tell which lists are associated with the structure returned by Trace
, and which are expressions being evaluated.
Looking at the input form resolves any ambiguities.
When you use a transformation rule in Trace
, the result is evaluated before being wrapped with HoldForm
For sophisticated computations, the list structures returned by Trace
can be quite complicated. When you use Trace[expr, form]
will include as elements in the lists only those expressions which match the pattern form
. But whatever pattern you give, the nesting structure of the lists remains the same.
This shows all occurrences of fib[_]
in the evaluation of fib
This shows only occurrences of fib
, but the nesting of the lists is the same as for fib[_]
You can set the option TraceDepth->n
to tell Trace
to include only lists nested at most n
levels deep. In this way, you can often pick out the "big steps" in a computation, without seeing the details. Note that by setting TraceDepth
you can avoid looking at many of the steps in a computation, and thereby significantly speed up the operation of Trace
for that computation.
This shows only steps that appear in lists nested at most two levels deep.
|trace the evaluation of expr, ignoring steps that lead to lists nested more than n levels deep|
Restricting the depth of tracing.
When you use Trace[expr, form]
, you get a list of all the expressions which match form
produced during the evaluation of expr
. Sometimes it is useful to see not only these expressions, but also the results that were obtained by evaluating them. You can do this by setting the option TraceForward->True
This shows not only expressions which match fac[_]
, but also the results of evaluating those expressions.
Expressions picked out using Trace[expr, form]
typically lie in the middle of an evaluation chain. By setting TraceForward->True
, you tell Trace
to include also the expression obtained at the end of the evaluation chain. If you set TraceForward->All
will include all
the expressions that occur after the expression matching form
on the evaluation chain.
, all elements on the evaluation chain after the one that matches fac[_]
By setting the option TraceForward
, you can effectively see what happens to a particular form of expression during an evaluation. Sometimes, however, you want to find out not what happens to a particular expression, but instead how that expression was generated. You can do this by setting the option TraceBackward
. What TraceBackward
does is to show you what preceded
a particular form of expression on an evaluation chain.
This shows that the number 120
came from the evaluation of fac
during the evaluation of fac
Here is the whole evaluation chain associated with the generation of the number 120
allow you to look forward and backward in a particular evaluation chain. Sometimes, you may also want to look at the evaluation chains within which the particular evaluation chain occurs. You can do this using TraceAbove
. If you set the option TraceAbove->True
, then Trace
will include the initial and final expressions in all the relevant evaluation chains. With TraceAbove->All
includes all the expressions in all these evaluation chains.
This includes the initial and final expressions in all evaluation chains which contain the chain that contains 120
This shows all the ways that fib
is generated during the evaluation of fib
|Trace[expr,form,opts]||trace the evaluation of expr using the specified options|
|TraceForward->True||include the final expression in the evaluation chain containing form|
|TraceForward->All||include all expressions following form in the evaluation chain|
|TraceBackward->True||include the first expression in the evaluation chain containing form|
|TraceBackward->All||include all expressions preceding form in the evaluation chain|
|TraceAbove->True||include the first and last expressions in all evaluation chains which contain the chain containing form|
|TraceAbove->All||include all expressions in all evaluation chains which contain the chain containing form|
Option settings for including extra steps in trace lists.
The basic way that Trace[expr, ...]
works is to intercept each expression encountered during the evaluation of expr
, and then to use various criteria to determine whether this expression should be recorded. Normally, however, Trace
intercepts expressions only after
function arguments have been evaluated. By setting TraceOriginal->True
, you can get Trace
also to look at expressions before
function arguments have been evaluated.
This includes expressions which match fac[_]
both before and after argument evaluation.
The list structure produced by Trace
normally includes only expressions that constitute steps in non-trivial evaluation chains. Thus, for example, individual symbols that evaluate to themselves are not normally included. Nevertheless, if you set TraceOriginal->True
, then Trace
looks at absolutely every expression involved in the evaluation process, including those that have trivial evaluation chains.
In this case, Trace
includes absolutely all expressions, even those with trivial evaluation chains.
|TraceForward||False||whether to show expressions following form in the evaluation chain|
|TraceBackward||False||whether to show expressions preceding form in the evaluation chain|
|TraceAbove||False||whether to show evaluation chains leading to the evaluation chain containing form|
|TraceOriginal||False||whether to look at expressions before their heads and arguments are evaluated|
Additional options for Trace.
When you use Trace
to study the execution of a program, there is an issue about how local variables in the program should be treated. As discussed in "How Modules Work"
scoping constructs such as Module
create symbols with new names to represent local variables. Thus, even if you called a variable x
in the original code for your program, the variable may effectively be renamed x$nnn
when the program is executed.
is set up so that by default a symbol x
that appears in form
will match all symbols with names of the form x$nnn
that arise in the execution of expr
. As a result, you can for example use Trace[expr, x=_]
to trace assignment to all variables, local and global, that were named x
in your original program.
|include all steps in the execution of expr that match form, with no replacements for local variable names allowed|
Preventing the matching of local variables.
In some cases, you may want to trace only the global variable x
, and not any local variables that were originally named x
. You can do this by setting the option MatchLocalNames->False
This traces assignments to all variables with names of the form x$nnn
This traces assignments only to the specific global variable x
The function Trace
performs a complete computation, then returns a structure which represents the history of the computation. Particularly in very long computations, it is however sometimes useful to see traces of the computation as it proceeds. The function TracePrint
works essentially like Trace
, except that it prints expressions when it encounters them, rather than saving up all of the expressions to create a list structure.
The sequence of expressions printed by TracePrint
corresponds to the sequence of expressions given in the list structure returned by Trace
. Indentation in the output from TracePrint
corresponds to nesting in the list structure from Trace
. You can use the Trace
. However, since TracePrint
produces output as it goes, it cannot support the option TraceBackward
. In addition, TracePrint
is set up so that TraceOriginal
is effectively always set to True
|Trace[expr,...]||trace the evaluation of expr, returning a list structure containing the expressions encountered|
|TracePrint[expr,...]||trace the evaluation of expr, printing the expressions encountered|
|TraceDialog[expr,...]||trace the evaluation of expr, initiating a dialog when each specified expression is encountered|
|TraceScan[f,expr,...]||trace the evaluation of expr, applying f to HoldForm of each expression encountered|
Functions for tracing evaluation.
This enters a dialog when fac
is encountered during the evaluation of fac
Inside the dialog you can for example find out where you are by looking at the "stack".
This returns from the dialog, and gives the final result from the evaluation of fac
The function TraceDialog
effectively allows you to stop in the middle of a computation, and interact with the Mathematica
environment that exists at that time. You can for example find values of intermediate variables in the computation, and even reset those values. There are however a number of subtleties, mostly associated with pattern and module variables.
does is to call the function Dialog
on a sequence of expressions. The Dialog
function is discussed in detail in "Dialogs"
. When you call Dialog
, you are effectively starting a subsidiary Mathematica
session with its own sequence of input and output lines.
In general, you may need to apply arbitrary functions to the expressions you get while tracing an evaluation. TraceScan[f, expr, ...]
to each expression that arises. The expression is wrapped with HoldForm
to prevent it from evaluating.
In TraceScan[f, expr, ...]
, the function f
is applied to expressions before they are evaluated. TraceScan[f, expr, patt, fp]
before evaluation, and fp