If you have an equation like
2x
0, it is perfectly clear that the only possible solution is
x->0. However, if you have an equation like
ax
0, things are not so clear. If
a is not equal to zero, then
x->0 is again the only solution. However, if
a is in fact equal to zero, then
any value of
x is a solution. You can see this by using
Reduce.
A basic difference between
Reduce and
Solve is that
Reduce gives
all the possible solutions to a set of equations, while
Solve gives only the
generic ones. Solutions are considered "generic" if they involve conditions only on the variables that you explicitly solve for, and not on other parameters in the equations.
Reduce and
Solve also differ in that
Reduce always returns combinations of equations, while
Solve gives results in the form of transformation rules.
When you have several simultaneous equations,
Reduce can show you under what conditions the equations have solutions.
Solve shows you whether there are any generic solutions.
When you work with systems of linear equations, you can use
Solve to get generic solutions, and
Reduce to find out for what values of parameters solutions exist.
For nonlinear equations, the conditions for the existence of solutions can be much more complicated.