This finds an integer null vector for a vector of exact real numbers:
This proves that there is no null vector with norm less than or equal to 8:
For a bound close to the norm of a null vector you may not get proof that no null vector exists:
The returned null vector does not satisfy the norm bound:
FindIntegerNullVector cannot prove that numbers are linearly independent over the integers:
It can prove that there is no integer null vector with norm less than or equal to a given bound:
For inexact input, the relation is true up to the precision of the input:
No null vector exists for the given norm bound:
Here no null vector is found, but nonexistence of a null vector is proven only for a smaller norm bound:
This finds a null vector for a 20-digit approximation of

:
The result is not a null vector for the exact vector

:
A null vector found for a higher-precision approximation of

is also a null vector for

:
This gives a Gaussian integer null vector for a vector of exact complex numbers:
This finds a Gaussian integer null vector for a vector of approximate complex numbers: