Complex Polynomial Systems
The Mathematica functions Reduce, Resolve, and FindInstance allow you to solve a wide variety of problems that can be expressed in terms of equations and inequalities. The functions use a collection of algorithms applicable to classes of problems satisfying particular properties, as well as a set of heuristics that attempt to reduce the given problem to a sequence of problems that can be solved using the algorithms. This tutorial describes the algorithms used to solve the class of problems known as complex polynomial systems. It characterizes the structure of the returned answers and describes the options that affect various aspects of the methods involved.
A complex polynomial system is an expression constructed with polynomial equations and inequations
combined using logical connectives and quantifiers
An occurrence of a variable inside or is called a bound occurrence, and any other occurrence of is called a free occurrence. A variable is called a free variable of a complex polynomial system if the system contains a free occurrence of . A complex polynomial system is quantifier-free if it contains no quantifiers.
Here is an example of a complex polynomial system with free variables , , and .
In Mathematica, quantifiers are represented using the functions Exists () and ForAll ().
Any complex polynomial system can be transformed to the prenex normal form
where each is a quantifier or , and is quantifier-free.
Any quantifier-free complex polynomial system can be transformed to the disjunctive normal form
where each is a polynomial equation or inequation.
Reduce, Resolve, and FindInstance always put complex polynomial systems in the prenex normal form, with quantifier-free parts in the disjunctive normal form, and subtract the sides of the equations and inequations to put them in the form
In all the tutorials for complex polynomial system solving, assume that the system has been transformed to this form.
Reduce can solve arbitrary complex polynomial systems. The solution (possibly after expanding with respect to ) is a disjunction of terms of the form
where are the free variables of the system, each is a polynomial, each is an algebraic function expressed using radicals or Root objects, and any terms of the conjunction (2) may be absent. Each is well defined, that is, no denominators or leading terms of Root objects in become zero for any satisfying the preceding terms of the conjunction (2).
This solves the system (1
Resolve can eliminate quantifiers from arbitrary complex polynomial systems. If no variables are specified, the result is a logical combination of terms
where and are polynomials, and each is a free variable of the system. With variables specified in the input, Resolve gives the same answer as Reduce.
This eliminates quantifiers from the system (1
FindInstance can handle arbitrary complex polynomial systems giving instances of complex solutions, or an empty list for systems that have no solutions. If the number of instances requested is more than one, the instances are randomly generated from the full solution of the system, and therefore they may depend on the value of the option. If one instance is requested, a faster algorithm that produces one instance is used, and the instance returned is always the same.
This finds a solution for the system (1
The main tool used in solving complex polynomial systems is the Gröbner basis algorithm , which is available in Mathematica as the GroebnerBasis function.
This section gives a very brief introduction to the theory of Gröbner bases. It presents only the properties that are necessary to describe the algorithms used by Mathematica in solving complex polynomial systems. For a more complete presentation see, for example, [1, 2]. Note that what  calls a monomial,  calls a term, and vice versa. This tutorial uses the terminology of .
A monomial in is an expression of the form with non-negative integers .
Let be the set of all monomials in . A monomial order is a linear order on , such that for all , and implies for all .
Let be a field, the domain of integers, or the domain of univariate polynomials over a field. Let and be functions defined as follows. If is a field, , and . If is the domain of integers, and are the integer quotient and remainder functions, with . If is the domain of univariate polynomials over a field, and are the polynomial quotient and remainder functions.
A product , where is a nonzero element of and is a monomial, is called a term.
Let be a monomial order on , and let . The leading monomial of is the -largest monomial appearing in , the leading coefficient of is the coefficient at in , and the leading term of is the product .
A Gröbner basis of an ideal in , with respect to a monomial order , is a finite set of polynomials, such that for each , there exists , such that divides . Every ideal has a Gröbner basis (see  for a proof).
Let , and let be a monomial. A term is reducible modulo , if divides , and . If is reducible modulo , the reduction of modulo is the polynomial
Note that if , then ; otherwise, .
Let , and let be an ordered finite subset of . is reducible modulo if contains a term reducible modulo an element of . The reduction of modulo is defined by the following procedure. While the set of terms of reducible modulo an element of is not empty, take the term with the -largest monomial, take the first , such that is reducible modulo , and replace the term in with . Note that the monomials of terms chosen in subsequent steps of the procedure form a -descending chain, and each monomial can appear at most times, where is the number of elements of , hence the procedure terminates.
A Gröbner basis is semi-reduced if for all , is not reducible modulo , and if is the domain of integers, .
The Mathematica function GroebnerBasis returns semi-reduced Gröbner bases. In the following discussion, all Gröbner bases are assumed to be semi-reduced. Note that this is not the same as reduced Gröbner bases defined in the literature, since here the basis polynomials are not required to be monic. For a fixed monomial order, every ideal has a unique reduced Gröbner basis. Semi-reduced Gröbner bases defined here are only unique up to multiplication by invertible elements of (see Property 2).
Property 1: Let be a Gröbner basis of an ideal in , and let . Then iff .
This is a simple consequence of the definitions.
Property 2: Let and be two Gröbner bases of an ideal with respect to the same monomial order , and suppose that elements of and are ordered by their leading monomials. Then , and for all , if is the domain of integers, ; otherwise, for some invertible element of .
Proof: If , then is reducible modulo or is reducible modulo . Hence the leading monomials of the elements of a Gröbner basis are all different. Without loss of generality, assume . For induction, fix and suppose that for all , for some invertible element of . If is the domain of integers, . Without loss of generality, assume . Since belongs to , there exists such that divides . Then , and so . If , then would be reducible modulo and also modulo , which is impossible, since is semi-reduced. Hence , and , and divides . Similarly, divides . Therefore, there exists an invertible element of , such that . If is the domain of integers, and are positive, and so . Let . Suppose . Since belongs to , must be divisible by , for some . Let and be the coefficients at in and . If is a field, the term of is reducible modulo , which contradicts the assumption that is semi-reduced. If is the domain of univariate polynomials over a field,
and so either is reducible modulo , or is reducible modulo , which contradicts the assumption that and are semi-reduced. Finally, let be the domain of integers. Since neither is reducible modulo nor is reducible modulo , and . Hence , which is impossible, since is divisible by . Therefore , and so . By induction on , for all , . If , then would be reducible modulo some , with , and hence would be reducible modulo . Therefore , which completes the proof of Property 2.
Property 3: Let be an ideal in , let , and let be a Gröbner basis of the ideal in . Then belongs to the radical of iff for an invertible element of .
If an ideal contains invertible elements of , GroebnerBasis always returns .
Proof: Note first that
belongs to the ideal for any non-negative integer . Hence, if belongs to the radical of , then 1 belongs to . Since is a Gröbner basis of , it must contain an element whose leading coefficient divides 1. Hence is an invertible element of . Since is semi-reduced and divides any term, . Now suppose that for an invertible element of . Then 1 belongs to , and so
where each belongs to , and each belongs to . Hence comparing coefficients at powers of leads to the following equations modulo : , , for , and . Then, , for , and modulo . Therefore, belongs to the radical of , which completes the proof of Property 3.
The following more technical property is important for solving complex polynomial systems.
Property 4: Let be a Gröbner basis of an ideal in with a monomial order that makes monomials containing greater than monomials not containing , let be the element of with the lowest positive degree in , let be the leading coefficient of in , and let be all elements of that do not depend on . Then for any polynomial and any point if , , for , and , then .
Proof: Consider the pseudoremainder of the division of by as polynomials in .
Since and belong to , so does . By Property 1, reduction of by must yield zero. Since the degree of in is less than , cannot be reduced by any of the elements of that depend on . Hence
and so . Since , (1) implies that , which completes the proof of Property 4.
Mathematica Function GroebnerBasis
The Mathematica function GroebnerBasis finds semi-reduced Gröbner bases. This section describes GroebnerBasis options used in the solving of complex polynomial systems.
|CoefficientDomain||Automatic||the type of objects assumed to be coefficients|
|Method||Automatic||the method used to compute the basis|
|MonomialOrder||Lexicographic||the criterion used for ordering monomials|
GroebnerBasis options used in the solving of complex polynomial systems.
This option specifies the domain of coefficients. With the default Automatic setting, the coefficient domain is the field generated by numeric coefficients present in the input.
|Integers||the domain of integers|
|InexactNumbers[prec]||inexact numbers with precision prec|
|Polynomials[x]||the domain of polynomials in |
|RationalFunctions||the field of rational functions in variables not on the variable list given to GroebnerBasis|
|Rationals||the field of rational numbers|
Available settings for .
Note that the coefficient domain also depends on the setting of the Modulus option of GroebnerBasis. With Modulus->p, for a prime number , the coefficient domain is the field , or the field of rational functions over if .
With the default setting Method->Automatic, GroebnerBasis normally uses a variant of the Buchberger algorithm. Another algorithm available is the Gröbner walk, which computes a Gröbner basis in an easier monomial order and then transforms it to the required harder monomial order. This is often faster than directly computing a Gröbner basis in the required order, especially if the input polynomials are known to be a Gröbner basis for the easier order. With the Method->Automatic setting, GroebnerBasis uses the Gröbner walk for the default CoefficientDomain->Rationals and .
|find a Gröbner basis in and use the Gröbner walk algorithm to transform it to a Gröbner basis in |
Transforming Gröbner bases using the Gröbner walk algorithm.
This option specifies the monomial order. The value can be either one of the named monomial orders or a weight matrix. The following table gives conditions for .
Quantifier elimination needs an order in which monomials containing quantifier variables are greater than monomials not containing quantifier variables. The order satisfies this condition, but the following usually leads to faster computations.
where denotes total degree, denotes free variables, denotes quantifier variables, and are monomials, and denotes the order.
Using requires the GroebnerBasis syntax with elimination variables specified.
|find a Gröbner basis in |
Gröbner basis in elimination order.
By default, GroebnerBasis with drops the polynomials that contain from the result, returning only basis polynomials in . To get all basis polynomials, the value of the system option from the group must be changed. (Mathematica changes the option locally in the quantifier elimination algorithm.) The option value can be changed with
|"EliminateFromGroebnerBasis"||True||whether GroebnerBasis with should remove polynomials containing elimination variables|
System option .
. The answer is a polynomial whose zeros are the Zariski closure of the projection of the solution set of the two original equations on the
The exact description of the projection of the solution set on the
plane depends on all basis polynomials. Note that the second basis polynomial cannot be zero if
This resets the system option to its default value.
gives the exact description of the projection of the solution set on the
A decision problem is a system with all variables existentially quantified, that is, a system of the form
where are all variables in . Solving a decision problem means deciding whether it is equivalent to True or to False, that is, deciding whether the quantifier-free system of polynomial equations and inequations has solutions.
Solving this decision problem proves that a quadratic equation with a zero determinant cannot have two different roots.
Given the identities
solving any decision problem can be reduced to solving a finite number of decision problems of the form
By Hilbert's Nullstellensatz and Property 3 of Gröbner bases
has complex solutions iff
with an arbitrary monomial order, is different than .
This shows that
has complex solutions.
This shows that
has no complex solutions.
When Mathematica solves a decision problem, the monomial order used by the GroebnerBasis computation is , with specified as the elimination variable list. This setting corresponds to the monomial ordering in which monomials containing are greater than those that do not contain , and the ordering of monomials not containing is degree reverse lexicographic. If there is no inequation condition, there is no need to introduce , and Mathematica uses .
For any complex polynomial system there exists an equivalent quantifier-free complex polynomial system. This follows from Chevalley's theorem, which states that a projection of a quasi-algebraically constructible set (a solution set of a quantifier-free system of polynomial equations and inequations) is a quasi-algebraically constructible set . Quantifier elimination is the procedure of finding a quantifier-free complex polynomial system equivalent to a given complex polynomial system. In Mathematica, quantifier elimination for complex polynomial systems is done by Resolve. It is also used by Reduce and FindInstance as the first step in solving or finding instances of solutions of complex polynomial systems.
Eliminating quantifiers from this system gives a condition for quadratic equations to have at least two different zeros.
For complex polynomial systems Mathematica uses the following quantifier elimination method. Given the identities
eliminating quantifiers from any complex polynomial system can be reduced to a finite number of single existential quantifier eliminations from systems of the form
To eliminate the quantifier from (1), Mathematica first computes the Gröbner basis of equations
with a monomial order that makes monomials containing greater than monomials not containing .
The monomial order used is EliminationOrder, with specified as the elimination variable list and all basis polynomials kept.
If contains no polynomials that depend on , then a quantifier-free system equivalent to (1) can be obtained by equating all elements of to zero, and asserting that at least one coefficient of as a polynomial in is not equal to zero. Otherwise let be the element of with the lowest positive degree in , let be the leading coefficient of in , and let be all elements of that do not depend on . Now (1) can be split into a disjunction of two systems
To eliminate the quantifier from (2), the quantifier elimination procedure is called recursively. Since the ideal generated by strictly contains the ideal generated by , the Noetherian property of polynomial rings guarantees finiteness of the recursion.
If belongs to the radical of the ideal generated by , which is exactly when 1 belongs to
(3) is equivalent to False. Otherwise let
be the pseudoremainder of the division of by as polynomials in . Then (3) is equivalent to the quantifier-free system
To show that (3) implies (4), suppose that satisfies (3). Then and there exists , such that
Since and belong to the ideal generated by ,
and . Hence
which implies that
To show that (4) implies (3), suppose that satisfies (4). Then
Since is a polynomial of degree , and is a nonzero polynomial of degree less than , there is a root of such that divides but not for some . If were zero, then would divide , which is impossible because it would imply that divides . Therefore . Property 4 shows that for any polynomial . Since is a Gröbner basis of the ideal generated by ,
which completes the proof of correctness of the quantifier elimination algorithm.
This eliminates the quantifier from
is a nonzero constant, (2
) is False
and the equivalent quantifier-free system is given by (4
is a nonzero constant, (4
This resets the system option to its default value.
Arbitrary Complex Polynomial Systems
FindInstance can handle arbitrary complex polynomial systems giving instances of complex solutions, or an empty list for systems that have no solutions. If the number of instances requested is more than one, the instances are randomly generated from the full solution of the system given by Reduce. If one instance is requested, a faster algorithm that produces one instance is used. Here is a description of the algorithm used to find a single instance, or prove that a system has no solutions.
If the system contains general quantifiers (), the quantifier elimination algorithm is used to eliminate the innermost quantifiers until the system contains only existential quantifiers () or is quantifier-free. Note that
has solutions if and only if has solutions, and if is a solution of , then is a solution of (1). Hence to find instances of solutions of systems containing only existential quantifiers it is enough to be able to find instances of quantifier-free systems. Moreover, is a solution of
if and only if it is a solution of one of the , with , so it is enough to show how to find instances of solutions of
First compute the GroebnerBasis of with , eliminating the polynomials that depend on (if there is no inequation condition, is the GroebnerBasis of with ). If contains 1, there are no solutions. Otherwise, compute a subset of of the highest cardinality among subsets strongly independent modulo the ideal generated by with respect to the degree reverse lexicographic order (, Section 9.3). Reorder so that , and compute the lexicographic order GroebnerBasis of the ideal generated by . To compute , Mathematica uses the Gröbner walk algorithm.
For each of the variables , , select the polynomial with the smallest leading monomial among elements of that depend on and not on . Let be the leading coefficient of as a polynomial in . If depends on a variable that is not in , replace with the lexicographic order Gröbner basis of the ideal generated by and . The following shows that this operation keeps strongly independent modulo the ideal generated by . Hence, possibly after a finite (by the Noetherian property of polynomial rings) number of extensions of , the leading coefficient of depends only on , for all . For the set of polynomials , let be the set of common zeros of elements of . Both and have dimension , and , hence any -dimensional irreducible component of is also a component of . Since does not vanish on any irreducible component of , it does not vanish on any -dimensional irreducible component of . Therefore, the Gröbner basis of and contains a polynomial depending only on . Let . To find a solution of (2), pick its last coordinates so that . For all , , and so by Property 4 if , for , is chosen to be the first root of , then . Moreover, , because otherwise would belong to , which would imply that , which is impossible since divides .
To prove the correctness of the aforementioned algorithm, it must be shown that extending by that depend on a variable not in preserves strong independence of modulo the ideal generated by . Suppose for some , depends on a variable, which is not in . Let denote the ideal generated by , and let denote the ideal generated by and . Then does not contain nonzero elements of . To prove this, suppose that where and . Then , with , and
belongs to the ideal generated by , and so does . This contradicts the choice of since the leading monomial of depends on and is strictly smaller than the leading monomial of . Therefore, the projection of on is dense in , and so, since has dimension , must be zero on some irreducible component of whose projection on is dense in . Since is the Zariski closure of the projection of the -dimensional set , is contained in the Zariski closure of the projection of an irreducible component of . has dimension , hence is zero on , and the projection of on is dense in , which proves that is strongly independent modulo the ideal generated by and .
Here is an example in which
needs to be extended. Here
is zero on one of the two one-dimensional components of
results in all
only (in fact even constant) while preserving the strong independence of
Reduce can solve arbitrary complex polynomial systems. As the first step, Reduce uses the quantifier elimination algorithm to eliminate the quantifiers. If the obtained quantifier-free system is a disjunction, each term of the disjunction is solved separately, and the solution is given as a disjunction of the solutions of the terms. Thus, the problem is reduced to solving quantifier-free systems of the form
First compute the GroebnerBasis of with variable order and , and select the polynomials that do not depend on . Then the solution set of is equal to the solution set of (3) and does not vanish on any component of the zero set of . If contains 1, (3) has no solutions. Otherwise for each , such that the set of elements of depending on and not on any with is not empty, select an element of with the lowest positive degree in . If one of the leading coefficients of is zero on , that is, it belongs to the radical of the ideal generated by , replace by the lexicographic Gröbner basis of the ideal generated by and . Now split the system into
and call the solving procedure recursively on all but the last term of the disjunction (4). Note that the algebraic set is strictly contained in , so the recursion is finite. If the product of all the and belongs to the radical of the ideal generated by , the last term has no solutions. Otherwise, by Property 4, the solution set of the last term is equal to
The conditions guarantee that all the solutions (represented as radicals or Root objects) given by are well defined. Reduce performs several operations in order to simplify the inequation conditions returned, like removing multiple factors, removing factors common with earlier inequation conditions, reducing modulo the , and removing factors that are nonzero on .
Options for Reduce, Resolve, and FindInstance
The Mathematica functions for solving complex polynomial systems have a number of options that control the way they operate. This section gives a summary of these options.
|Backsubstitution||False||whether the solutions given by Reduce and Resolve with specified variables should be unwound by backsubstitution|
|Cubics||False||whether the Cardano formulas should be used to express solutions of cubics|
|Quartics||False||whether the Cardano formulas should be used to express solutions of quartics|
Options of Reduce and Resolve affecting the behavior of complex polynomial systems.
|WorkingPrecision||∞||the working precision to be used in computations, with the default settings of system options; the value of working precision affects only calls to Roots|
Options of Reduce, Resolve, and FindInstance affecting the behavior of complex polynomial systems.
By default, Reduce
may use variables appearing earlier in the variable list to express solutions for variables appearing later in the variable list.
uses backsubstitution to eliminate variables from the right-hand sides of the equations.
Cubics and Quartics
By default Reduce
does not use the Cardano formulas for solving cubics or quartics.
Setting the options Cubics
to use the Cardano formulas for solving cubics and quartics.
The ReduceOptions Group of System Options
Here are the system options from the group that may affect the behavior of Reduce, Resolve, and FindInstance for complex polynomial systems. The options can be set with
This sets the option
This checks the value of
This sets the option
back to the default value False
|"AlgebraicNumberOutput"||True||whether Reduce should output AlgebraicNumber objects instead of polynomials in one Root object|
|"FinitePrecisionGB"||False||whether finite values of working precision should be used in calls to GroebnerBasis|
|"ReorderVariables"||Automatic||whether Reduce, Resolve, and Solve are allowed to reorder the specified variables|
|"UseNestedRoots"||Automatic||whether Root objects representing algebraic numbers defined by triangular systems of equations can be used in the output|
group options that affect the behavior of Reduce, Resolve, and FindInstance for complex polynomial systems.
For systems with equational constraints generating a zero-dimensional ideal , Mathematica uses a variant of the CAD algorithm that finds projection polynomials using Gröbner basis methods. If the lexicographic order Gröbner basis of contains linear polynomials with constant coefficients in every variable but the last one (which is true "generically"), then all coordinates of a solution are polynomials in one algebraic number, namely the last coordinate. The setting of determines whether Reduce represents the solution coordinates as AlgebraicNumber objects in the field generated by the last coordinate.
By default, the solution coordinates are represented as AlgebraicNumber
, the solution coordinates are given as polynomials in a Root
Using finite precision may significantly improve the speed of GroebnerBasis
computations. However, the numeric computations may fail due to loss of precision, or give incorrect answers. They usually give less precise results than exact GroebnerBasis
computations followed by numeric root finding.
This shows that the results are equal up to their precision.
By default, Reduce
is not allowed to reorder the specified variables. Variables appearing earlier in the variable list may be used to express solutions for variables appearing later in the variable list, but not vice versa.
Setting the system option "ReorderVariables"->True
to pick a variable order that makes the equations easier to solve.
By default, Solve
is allowed to reorder the specified variables. In this example it is easier to solve for
first and express
in terms of the solution for
Setting the system option ReorderVariables->False
use the specified variable order.
By default, Reduce
, and FindInstance
may express solutions in terms of Root
objects representing algebraic numbers defined by triangular systems of equations.
Setting the system option UseNestedRoots->False
, and FindInstance
use algebraic numbers defined by univariate equations.
Finding minimal polynomials for all solution coordinates may be slow.
, and FindInstance
to use algebraic numbers defined by triangular systems that are linear in the last variable.
With the default setting UseNestedRoots->Automatic
represents the second coordinate as a polynomial in the first coordinate.
 Becker, T. and V. Weispfenning. Gröbner Bases. Springer-Verlag, 1993.
 Cox, D., J. Little, and D. O'Shea. Ideals, Varieties, and Algorithms. 2nd ed., Springer-Verlag, 1997.
 Łojasiewicz, S. Introduction to Complex Analytic Geometry. Birkhaüser, 1991.