FussellVeselyImportance[rdist,t]
時間 t におけるReliabilityDistribution rdist の全成分のFussell–Vesely重要度を与える.
FussellVeselyImportance[fdist,t]
時間 t におけるFailureDistribution fdist の全成分のFussell–Vesely重要度を与える.
FussellVeselyImportance
FussellVeselyImportance[rdist,t]
時間 t におけるReliabilityDistribution rdist の全成分のFussell–Vesely重要度を与える.
FussellVeselyImportance[fdist,t]
時間 t におけるFailureDistribution fdist の全成分のFussell–Vesely重要度を与える.
例題
すべて開く すべて閉じる例 (3)
ℛ = ReliabilityDistribution[x∧y, {{x, ExponentialDistribution[1]}, {y, ExponentialDistribution[2]}}];結果はReliabilityDistributionにおける分布リストと同じ順で与えられる:
FussellVeselyImportance[ℛ, t]{Subscript[fv, x], Subscript[fv, y]} = FussellVeselyImportance[ℛ, t]Plot[{Subscript[fv, x], Subscript[fv, y]}, {t, 0, 2}, Filling -> Axis, AxesOrigin -> {0, 0}]ℛ = ReliabilityDistribution[x∨y, {{x, ExponentialDistribution[Subscript[λ, 1]]}, {y, ExponentialDistribution[Subscript[λ, 2]]}}];FussellVeselyImportance[ℛ, t]ℱ = FailureDistribution[x∨y, {{x, WeibullDistribution[2, 3]}, {y, WeibullDistribution[4, 5]}}];FussellVeselyImportance[ℱ, t]Plot[%, {t, 0, 8}, Filling -> Axis]スコープ (16)
ReliabilityDistributionモデル (8)
ℛ = ReliabilityDistribution[x∧y, {{x, ExponentialDistribution[λ]}, {y, ExponentialDistribution[λ]}}];どちらの成分の信頼性が変わっても系の信頼性が同じように変わる:
FussellVeselyImportance[ℛ, t]寿命分布が等しい3つの成分のうちの2つが動くためには必要な系:
ℛ = ReliabilityDistribution[BooleanCountingFunction[{2, 3}, {x, y, z}], {{x, ExponentialDistribution[λ]}, {y, ExponentialDistribution[λ]}, {z, ExponentialDistribution[λ]}}];FussellVeselyImportance[ℛ, t]//Simplifyd = ExponentialDistribution[1];ℛ = ReliabilityDistribution[x∧(y∨z), {{x, d}, {y, d}, {z, d}}];fv = FussellVeselyImportance[ℛ, t]成分xの信頼性を変更すると系の信頼性に最も大きい影響がある:
Plot[Evaluate@MapThread[Tooltip, {fv, {x, y, z}}], {t, 0, 6}, PlotRange -> All]d = ExponentialDistribution[1];ℛ = ReliabilityDistribution[x∨(y∧z), {{x, d}, {y, d}, {z, d}}];fv = FussellVeselyImportance[ℛ, t]Plot[Evaluate@MapThread[Tooltip, {fv, {x, y, z}}], {t, 0, 4}]{Subscript[d, 1], Subscript[d, 2], Subscript[d, 3]} = {ExponentialDistribution[1], ExponentialDistribution[2], ExponentialDistribution[λ]};ℛ = ReliabilityDistribution[x∨(y∧z), {{x, Subscript[d, 1]}, {y, Subscript[d, 2]}, {z, Subscript[d, 3]}}];fv = FussellVeselyImportance[ℛ, t]並列成分の1つであるzを悪化させた場合の重要度の変化を示す:
Table[
Plot[Evaluate@MapThread[Tooltip, {fv /. λ -> k, {x, y, z}}], {t, 0, 4}, PlotRange -> All, PlotLabel -> k]
, {k, 1, 5, 2}]dists = {{x, ExponentialDistribution[1]}, {y, ExponentialDistribution[2]}, {z, ExponentialDistribution[1]}};ℛ = ReliabilityDistribution[x∧(y∨z), dists];FussellVeselyImportance[ℛ, 3 / 2]FussellVeselyImportance[ℛ, 1.5]FussellVeselyImportance[ℛ, t]任意の有効なReliabilityDistributionを使うことができる:
{Subscript[𝒟, 1], Subscript[𝒟, 2]} = {ExponentialDistribution[1 / 2], ExponentialDistribution[2]};ℛ = ReliabilityDistribution[x∧y, {{x, Subscript[𝒟, 1]}, {y, StandbyDistribution[Subscript[𝒟, 2], {Subscript[𝒟, 2], Subscript[𝒟, 2]}]}}];FussellVeselyImportance[ℛ, t]寿命の後期にスタンドバイ成分yの信頼性を変えるとより効果がある:
Plot[%, {t, 0, 6}, Filling -> Axis]部分系の重要性尺度を得るために段階を追って系をモデル化する:
ℛsub = ReliabilityDistribution[x∨y, {{x, ExponentialDistribution[1]}, {y, ExponentialDistribution[1]}}];ℛ = ReliabilityDistribution[z∧r, {{z, ExponentialDistribution[1]}, {r, ℛsub}}];fv = FussellVeselyImportance[ℛ, t]Plot[Evaluate@MapThread[Tooltip, {fv, {z, r}}], {t, 0, 4}]FailureDistributionモデル (8)
ℱ = FailureDistribution[x∨y, {{x, ExponentialDistribution[λ]}, {y, ExponentialDistribution[λ]}}];FussellVeselyImportance[ℱ, t]ℱ = FailureDistribution[x∧y, {{x, ExponentialDistribution[λ]}, {y, ExponentialDistribution[λ]}}];FussellVeselyImportanceは両方の事象を同様に重要なものとして順位付ける:
FussellVeselyImportance[ℱ, t]ℱ = FailureDistribution[BooleanCountingFunction[{2, 3}, {x, y, z}], {{x, ExponentialDistribution[λ]}, {y, ExponentialDistribution[λ]}, {z, ExponentialDistribution[λ]}}];任意の事象の信頼性を変えると頂上事象の信頼性が同じように変わる:
FussellVeselyImportance[ℱ, t]//Simplifyd = ExponentialDistribution[1];ℱ = FailureDistribution[x∧(y∨z), {{x, d}, {y, d}, {z, d}}];fv = FussellVeselyImportance[ℱ, t]事象xの信頼性を変えることが頂上事象の信頼性に最も影響がある:
Plot[Evaluate@MapThread[Tooltip, {fv, {x, y, z}}], {t, 0, 4}, PlotRange -> All]d = ExponentialDistribution[1];ℱ = FailureDistribution[x∨(y∧z), {{x, d}, {y, d}, {z, d}}];fv = FussellVeselyImportance[ℱ, t]事象xを向上させることが頂上事象を防ぐ上で最大の効果がある:
Plot[Evaluate@MapThread[Tooltip, {fv, {x, y, z}}], {t, 0, 4}, PlotRange -> All]{Subscript[d, 1], Subscript[d, 2], Subscript[d, 3]} = {ExponentialDistribution[1], ExponentialDistribution[1], ExponentialDistribution[λ]};ℱ = FailureDistribution[x∧(y∨z), {{x, Subscript[d, 1]}, {y, Subscript[d, 2]}, {z, Subscript[d, 3]}}];fv = FussellVeselyImportance[ℱ, t]基本事象の1つであるzを悪化させた場合の重要度の変化を示す:
Table[
Plot[Evaluate@MapThread[Tooltip, {fv /. λ -> k, {x, y, z}}], {t, 0, 2}, PlotRange -> All, PlotLabel -> k]
, {k, 1, 5, 2}]任意の有効なFailureDistributionを使うことができる:
{Subscript[𝒟, 1], Subscript[𝒟, 2]} = {ExponentialDistribution[1], ExponentialDistribution[3]};ℱ = FailureDistribution[x∨y, {{x, Subscript[𝒟, 1]}, {y, StandbyDistribution[Subscript[𝒟, 2], {Subscript[𝒟, 2], Subscript[𝒟, 2]}]}}];FussellVeselyImportance[ℱ, t]寿命の初期段階でスタンドバイ成分yの信頼性を変えるとより効果がある:
Plot[Evaluate@%, {t, 0, 5}, Filling -> Axis]部分系の重要性尺度を得るために段階を追って系をモデル化する:
ℱsub = FailureDistribution[x∨y, {{x, ExponentialDistribution[1]}, {y, ExponentialDistribution[1]}}];ℱ = ReliabilityDistribution[z∧f, {{z, ExponentialDistribution[1]}, {f, ℱsub}}];fv = FussellVeselyImportance[ℱ, t]Plot[Evaluate@MapThread[Tooltip, {fv, {z, f}}], {t, 0, 4}]アプリケーション (3)
3時間持続しなければならない系で最も重要な成分はどれかを求める:
{Subscript[𝒟, 1], Subscript[𝒟, 2], Subscript[𝒟, 3], Subscript[𝒟, 4]} = {ExponentialDistribution[1], ExponentialDistribution[3], WeibullDistribution[2, 2], ErlangDistribution[1, 2]};ℛ = ReliabilityDistribution[(x∧(y∨z))∨v, {{x, Subscript[𝒟, 1]}, {y, Subscript[𝒟, 2]}, {z, Subscript[𝒟, 3]}, {v, Subscript[𝒟, 4]}}];Fussell–Vesely重要度によると成分vが最も重要である:
fv = FussellVeselyImportance[ℛ, 3.]炭鉱での問題の一つに,石炭の山の間の空洞に渡した橋からブルドーザーが落ちることがある.ブルドーザーは空洞の存在を知った上でその上に来ることもあれば,知らずに来ることもある:
dozerOverVoid = intentional∨unintentional;空洞は石炭の地中流出によって形成される.これは,コンベヤーベルトの下から石炭を搬出し開放供給機を撤去することで生じる:
subsurfaceFlow = conveyorOperation∧feeder;地表に流れがないことも原因となる.石炭が凍結すると地表の流れが止まる:
frozenArch = temperature∧inactivity∧waterContent;compaction = waterContent∧force;noSurfaceFlow = compaction∨frozenArch;dozerFalls = dozerOverVoid∧(subsurfaceFlow∧noSurfaceFlow);vars = {conveyorOperation, intentional, feeder, force, inactivity, temperature, unintentional, waterContent};lifetimes = ExponentialDistribution /@ {5.25, 0.00525, 1.768, 0.0175, 0.000175, 0.0175, 0.1075, 3.5};dists = Table[{vars[[i]], lifetimes[[i]]}, {i, Length[vars]}];ℱ = FailureDistribution[dozerFalls, dists];どのような行為が事故防止に繋がるかを知るために,基本事象の重要度を計算する:
fv = FussellVeselyImportance[ℱ, t]Plot[Evaluate@MapThread[Tooltip, {fv, vars}], {t, 0, 300}, PlotRange -> All]Cases[Transpose[{fv, vars}], {1, _}]弁が1つで余分なポンプが2つ付いた揚水装置を考える.成分の信頼度は確率で与えられる:
ℛ = ReliabilityDistribution[valve∧(pump1∨pump2), {{valve, BernoulliDistribution[0.99]}, {pump1, BernoulliDistribution[0.97]}, {pump2, BernoulliDistribution[0.97]}}];FussellVeselyImportance[ℛ, t]//Refine[#, t < 1]&特性と関係 (6)
直列接続のFussellVeselyImportanceは確率によって定義することができる:
{Subscript[𝒟, 1], Subscript[𝒟, 2]} = {ExponentialDistribution[Subscript[λ, 1]], ExponentialDistribution[Subscript[λ, 2]]};ℛ = ReliabilityDistribution[x∧y, {{x, Subscript[𝒟, 1]}, {y, Subscript[𝒟, 2]}}];FussellVeselyImportance[ℛ, t]Refine[Table[Probability[𝒯 ≤ t, 𝒯d] / Probability[𝒯 ≤ t, 𝒯ℛ], {d, {Subscript[𝒟, 1], Subscript[𝒟, 2]}}], t > 0]% - %%//FullSimplifyすべての並列な系のFussellVeselyImportanceは 1である:
ℛ = ReliabilityDistribution[x∨y, {{x, ExponentialDistribution[Subscript[λ, 1]]}, {y, ExponentialDistribution[Subscript[λ, 2]]}}];FussellVeselyImportance[ℛ, t]ℛ = ReliabilityDistribution[x∧(y∨z), {{x, ExponentialDistribution[Subscript[λ, 1]]}, {y, ExponentialDistribution[Subscript[λ, 2]]}, {z, ErlangDistribution[α, β]}}];fv = FussellVeselyImportance[ℛ, t]fv[[2]] - fv[[3]]CriticalityFailureImportanceは常にFussell–Vesely重要度以下である:
ℛ = ReliabilityDistribution[x∧y, {{x, WeibullDistribution[1 / 2, 3]}, {y, ExponentialDistribution[2]}}];cf = CriticalityFailureImportance[ℛ, t];
fv = FussellVeselyImportance[ℛ, t];Plot[{First[cf], First[fv]}, {t, 0, 10}]信頼性が高い成分のCriticalityFailureImportanceはFussell–Veselyに近付く:
𝒟 = ExponentialDistribution[λ];ℛ = ReliabilityDistribution[x∧y, {{x, 𝒟}, {y, 𝒟}}];cf = CriticalityFailureImportance[ℛ, t];
fv = FussellVeselyImportance[ℛ, t];Limit[fv - cf, λ -> 0]𝒟 = ExponentialDistribution[λ];FussellVeselyImportance[ReliabilityDistribution[x∧y, {{x, 𝒟}, {y, 𝒟}, {z, 𝒟}}], t]関連するガイド
-
▪
- 信頼性解析
テキスト
Wolfram Research (2012), FussellVeselyImportance, Wolfram言語関数, https://reference.wolfram.com/language/ref/FussellVeselyImportance.html.
CMS
Wolfram Language. 2012. "FussellVeselyImportance." Wolfram Language & System Documentation Center. Wolfram Research. https://reference.wolfram.com/language/ref/FussellVeselyImportance.html.
APA
Wolfram Language. (2012). FussellVeselyImportance. Wolfram Language & System Documentation Center. Retrieved from https://reference.wolfram.com/language/ref/FussellVeselyImportance.html
BibTeX
@misc{reference.wolfram_2026_fussellveselyimportance, author="Wolfram Research", title="{FussellVeselyImportance}", year="2012", howpublished="\url{https://reference.wolfram.com/language/ref/FussellVeselyImportance.html}", note=[Accessed: 06-July-2026]}
BibLaTeX
@online{reference.wolfram_2026_fussellveselyimportance, organization={Wolfram Research}, title={FussellVeselyImportance}, year={2012}, url={https://reference.wolfram.com/language/ref/FussellVeselyImportance.html}, note=[Accessed: 06-July-2026]}